Subject | Re: [ib-support] Re: blobs and multiple updates |
---|---|
Author | Doug Chamberlin |
Post date | 2003-05-13T18:58:44Z |
At 5/13/2003 12:03 PM (Tuesday), jbgilmartin wrote:
growth. That's 800MB per year, which I find entirely manageable and not all
that large. Perhaps with Access it is a problem but not with Firebird!
(run length encoding method).
>It is not just 800 objects, but 300 to 1500 per day. With Access'But 1500 objects times 1500 bytes each per log record is only 2.5MB per day
>storage methodology, one day's worth of log processing makes the DB
>grow by an order of magnitude.
growth. That's 800MB per year, which I find entirely manageable and not all
that large. Perhaps with Access it is a problem but not with Firebird!
> From what I understood varchars are not compressed on the data page,I think that is wrong. They are compressed along with the entire record
>they are stored full length in the record plus a two byte length
>indicator, thus there would be "empty" space at the each of each line
>up to the size of the varchar field. Am I wrong?
(run length encoding method).