Subject | Re: [ib-support] DPA found Linux faster than W2k. Is that general experience? |
---|---|
Author | Daniel Rail |
Post date | 2003-05-01T08:43:17Z |
Hi,
At April 30, 2003, 23:36, Mark Patterson wrote:
seems to be slower than on Win2000 Server. The person didn't mention
about the speed of Firebird after the connection. I hope that the
connection time is not an indication that Firebird in general would
run slower on Win2003, since M$ is indicating that Win2003 is supposed
to be faster than Win2000.
--
Best regards,
Daniel Rail
Senior System Engineer
ACCRA Group Inc. (www.accra.ca)
ACCRA Med Software Inc. (www.filopto.com)
At April 30, 2003, 23:36, Mark Patterson wrote:
> Maybe the advantage of Linux will be lost with Win 2003 Server. According toSomeone posted just recently that it works, but the connection time
> this article, Win 2003 Server is faster than Linux:
> http://www.practical-tech.com/infrastructure/i04292003.htm
> But the point of that article is that a whole lot of stuff stops running on
> 2003. Does FB run on it?
seems to be slower than on Win2000 Server. The person didn't mention
about the speed of Firebird after the connection. I hope that the
connection time is not an indication that Firebird in general would
run slower on Win2003, since M$ is indicating that Win2003 is supposed
to be faster than Win2000.
--
Best regards,
Daniel Rail
Senior System Engineer
ACCRA Group Inc. (www.accra.ca)
ACCRA Med Software Inc. (www.filopto.com)