Subject | RE: [ib-support] 32 vs 64 bit? |
---|---|
Author | Leyne, Sean |
Post date | 2003-04-30T00:10:16Z |
Rick,
with a hard disk which has a file system which supports 64 bit file
addressing/IO
that the file paths are stored as an absolute reference in the 'primary'
db, so moving the DB is a hassle.
path, and only store the filename in the DB.
Sean
> I apologise if this has been covered before but does anybody have anyIn fact there isn't really much of a 'migration' necessary.
> experience migrating a 32 bit db to 64 bit?
> I am presuming that the .gdb files are incompatible and INo, the 'migration' involves using the correct engine binary on a server
> will have to do a migration.
with a hard disk which has a file system which supports 64 bit file
addressing/IO
> Is it more efficient to run a 32 bit db (X86 architectureI prefer a single file. One of the problems with secondary file, is
> under Linux) with multiple .gdb files, or a single 64 bit db?
that the file paths are stored as an absolute reference in the 'primary'
db, so moving the DB is a hassle.
> I've got an existing db that I need to add a table to thatI would recommend storing the files as separate OS files in a specific
> has large blobs (graphics files).
path, and only store the filename in the DB.
Sean