Subject | Re: [ib-support] MySQL vs Firebird comparison document? |
---|---|
Author | Martijn Tonies |
Post date | 2003-03-28T17:37:37Z |
Hi David,
- subselects
- constraints
- transactions (yes, the new InnoDB tables support it - but this is rather
slow on heavy load)
And being able to use:
- referential integrity
- triggers
- stored procedures
- online backups
- views
- subselects, joins etc :)
- a real and proven database management system :)
With regards,
Martijn Tonies
Database Workbench - the developer tool for InterBase & Firebird
Upscene Productions
http://www.upscene.com
"This is an object-oriented system.
If we change anything, the users object."
> One of our potential clients, a state-level government agency, isHow about no need to work around:
> considering consolidating/migrating some of their existing data
> systems to an open-source database.
>
> They are currently leaning toward MySQL, which I'm really not pleased
> about...
>
> Does anyone have a link handy for a MySQL vs Firebird comparison
> document that shows all the reasons why Firebird is the better choice?
- subselects
- constraints
- transactions (yes, the new InnoDB tables support it - but this is rather
slow on heavy load)
And being able to use:
- referential integrity
- triggers
- stored procedures
- online backups
- views
- subselects, joins etc :)
- a real and proven database management system :)
With regards,
Martijn Tonies
Database Workbench - the developer tool for InterBase & Firebird
Upscene Productions
http://www.upscene.com
"This is an object-oriented system.
If we change anything, the users object."