Subject | Re[2]: [ib-support] Firebird and SMP |
---|---|
Author | Carlos H. Cantu |
Post date | 2003-03-01T18:24:43Z |
Classic version misses the services API (backup/restore/etc...) and
does not share a common buffer for connections to the same database.
Dependening on how much RAM and how many connections (other factors
may apply) you will have on your system I think the performance of
classic will be worse than SS attached to one processor.
[]s
Carlos
WarmBoot Informatica - http://www.warmboot.com.br
FireBase - http://www.FireBase.com.br (Firebird/Interbase HQ)
AF> attached to 1 processor ??
AF> Thanks,
AF> Anderson
AF> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
AF> ib-support-unsubscribe@egroups.com
AF> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
does not share a common buffer for connections to the same database.
Dependening on how much RAM and how many connections (other factors
may apply) you will have on your system I think the performance of
classic will be worse than SS attached to one processor.
[]s
Carlos
WarmBoot Informatica - http://www.warmboot.com.br
FireBase - http://www.FireBase.com.br (Firebird/Interbase HQ)
>> FB has no SMP support on Windows machines. FB 1.5 will have a classicAF> Will this classic version be a better choice than using a SS version
>> version of the server that will run better on Win SMP machines.
>>
AF> attached to 1 processor ??
AF> Thanks,
AF> Anderson
AF> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
AF> ib-support-unsubscribe@egroups.com
AF> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/