Subject Re: AW: Re[2]: [ib-support] FB Hyper Threading and Performance
Author Phil Shrimpton
On Friday 28 February 2003 11:29, you wrote:


> Win2K sees the two CPUs, but it's scheduler is not optimized
> for the SMT (Simultaneous Multi-Threading) of a Hyperthreading-
> capable processor.
> So you will lose all benefits of Hyperthreading and your computer
> might even run slower than with Hyperthreading disabled.

That is my experiance with W2K AS, it ran much slower. If you search the
archives of the development list, you will find all the details


Linux 2.4.4-4GB
9:26am up 45 days, 15:15, 1 user, load average: 0.14, 0.03, 0.01