Subject | Chinese/Korean (was Re: Non - printable characters in Stored Procedures) |
---|---|
Author | hay77772000 |
Post date | 2003-11-21T19:26:12Z |
Hi Helen, all,
I'm trying my best to get my head around what we need to do to
support Chinese (simplified) and Korean.
experience of what we might run into?
Is there anyone out there that has actually used Firebird to support
simplified Chinese and/or Korean?
Many thanks,
David
--- In firebird-support@yahoogroups.com, Helen Borrie <helebor@t...>
wrote:
I'm trying my best to get my head around what we need to do to
support Chinese (simplified) and Korean.
> languages. There's a lot-lot-lot more to that than just choosingWould you mind explaining this a little further? Do you have any
> a character set for the database, not least because of the severe
> limitations of UNICODE_FSS.
experience of what we might run into?
Is there anyone out there that has actually used Firebird to support
simplified Chinese and/or Korean?
Many thanks,
David
--- In firebird-support@yahoogroups.com, Helen Borrie <helebor@t...>
wrote:
> At 10:19 AM 5/11/2003 +0200, you wrote:ASCII".
> >At 07:14 PM 05/11/2003 +1100, you wrote:
> >
> >
> > >If you are working with database default character set NONE
> > >(which I as one consider a cardinal sin), automatic charset
> > >conversion won't kick in, so you must add an "as ... charset
> > >other than
> > >Regards,
> > >Peter Jacobi
> >
> >Yeah, I would also like to know. I have never used anything else
> >NONE, and it hasn't ever caused me problems that I am aware of.databases
>
> Nor I. But it would cause me problems if I wanted to deploy my
> to countries that need a character set. In South Africa or theUK, you
> could choose an ISO character set and localize using collations.In *our*
> part of the world, we're more likely to be needing dual-languageChinese
> English/Japanese, English/Chinese or one or more of the Indo-
> languages. There's a lot-lot-lot more to that than just choosinga
> character set for the database, not least because of the severeand
> limitations of UNICODE_FSS.
>
> Peter's warning is "on the button" for countries that have locales
> keyboards inputting characters that are not in US ASCII. However,for
> English-speaking-only deployment, using a character set doesn'tnecessarily
> solve or forestall any problems. Our keyboards don't comestandard with
> those extra keys for switching input character sets, either.
>
> IMO, it gets down to good old *requirements*.
>
> h.