Subject | Re: Performance problems - need help urgently |
---|---|
Author | bazarin |
Post date | 2003-11-15T08:36:32Z |
--- In firebird-support@yahoogroups.com, "Svein Erling"
<svein.erling.tysvaer@k...> wrote:
I will come back to the hotel next Monday morning, collect all
information and will send to you. My apologies for answering late.
Regards,
Wagner
<svein.erling.tysvaer@k...> wrote:
> Wagner Bazarin wrote:joined to
>
> > > I am new with Firebird and Interbase development. I just
> > > a small training company developing management simulators.in
> > > We are using Firebird for the first time in a system for four
> > > clients and one database server. The client software are based
> > > two parts: one dataentry (that populate the database) andtime
> > > one 'executor' (that run the simulator tasks). At the first
> > > we run the sistem with only one client and the dataserver. Itwas
> > > ok. We also tested the 'executor' alone and it worked fine.When
> > > starting the client and the 'executor' all together the systemand
> > > stopped (we could get 11 minutes to run de 'executor' alone
> > > near 60 together with the client). We tried to run all clientsin
> > > the small four machines network and all worked fine, but as weto
> > > started the 'executor' in one machine all the system stopped
> > > work fine and run very slowly. We tryed to run the 'executor'in
> > > all machines without the client and the problem continued. Weone
> > > decided so to change the system spliting each equipment with
> > > client and one 'executor'. It runs now but the performance waseach
> > > poor. It seems that we cannot have more than one connection to
> > > firebird working. We decided so to connect and disconnect in
> > > SQL request but the performance was the same, althoug we couldget
> > > the client and the 'executor' working together. I changed thememory,
> > > ibconfig for the best performance due to we have very huge
> > > equipments installed (Pentium 4 HT with 2.6 Mz and 2 GB of
> > > plus 120 Gb disk in a Asus high performance motherboard). Weare
> > > are using Windows 2000 and only the client and the 'executor'
> > > running in the equipments (no MS-Office, graphics software,do..
> > > multimidia, etc).
>
> "Alan McDonald" replied:
>
> > I think you need to tell us a bit more about what these systems
> andclassic?
> > also
> >
> > 1. What version of firebird are you using - superserver or
> > 2. What language is the application written in?selectivity.
> > 3. What connection suite are you using to talk to the server?
>
> Also, give us some database statistics, like Oldest Active
> Transaction, Next Transaction, database size and index
> Maybe even a bit of SQL. And what do you mean by 'slow'? Often,indexes
> perceived slowness is due to wrong use of transactions, wrong
> or SQL or using Firebird as if it was a desktopdatabase/spreadsheet.
> However, if you require more than e.g. 10000 rows per second orhave
> some very demanding calculation, then it may also be that Firebirdmay
> have problems fulfilling your expectations.Thank you!
>
> Set
I will come back to the hotel next Monday morning, collect all
information and will send to you. My apologies for answering late.
Regards,
Wagner