At 12:45 AM 5/11/2003 -0500, you wrote:

>As a quick follow up, an index with selectivity such as .33333+ would
>not be that great of an index whereas
>
>an index with something like .00398 would be considered pretty good?

Yup. Separate "selectivity value" (the number in RDB$Statistics) from
"selectivity". As "selectivity value" goes up, "selectivity" goes down.

H.