Subject | Re: Superserver vs Classic Server |
---|---|
Author | Alexander V.Nevsky |
Post date | 2003-10-27T17:11:35Z |
--- In firebird-support@yahoogroups.com, Daniel Rail <daniel@a...>
wrote:
FB CS on Linux. When I tried Super on dual machine, it could'nt use
second processor and frozed all connections when performing heavy
query. After a week of nightmares (differences in IB4/IB6 optimizers
caused some my queries in triggers to become very heavy and it was'nt
noticed when testing, on production server only) I returned to
Classic. In FB1.5 there was made efforts on SS improvement but I
have'nt in mind to try it again, I'm pretty happy with CS.
Best regards,
Alexander.
wrote:
> Hi,Daniel, my steps with IB/FB were IB4 CS on SCO - IB6 SS on Linux -
>
> At October 27, 2003, 05:33, GOVINDKRISHNA wrote:
> > Superserver pros - less resources
> > Superserver cons - cannot take advantage of multiple processors.
>
> Apparently, it doesn't seem to be a problem on Linux, since Linux
> manages its threads better than Windows(that's what I've been told).
FB CS on Linux. When I tried Super on dual machine, it could'nt use
second processor and frozed all connections when performing heavy
query. After a week of nightmares (differences in IB4/IB6 optimizers
caused some my queries in triggers to become very heavy and it was'nt
noticed when testing, on production server only) I returned to
Classic. In FB1.5 there was made efforts on SS improvement but I
have'nt in mind to try it again, I'm pretty happy with CS.
Best regards,
Alexander.