Subject | Re: [firebird-support] Re: Superserver vs Classic Server |
---|---|
Author | Milan Babuskov |
Post date | 2003-10-24T15:22:10Z |
plenum3 wrote:
maintain. When the SS is under big load (monthly reports, etc.) it just
cuts all other users, and to them it seems like it just hangs. CS
balances that load, so if someone runs monthly report, and other users
just want's to do a quick transaction, he doesn't have to wait few hours
to do it.
Look in group archives for a thread named "Time sharing", around 20th
May this year for more info about this.
CS is just great for these kind of sitations.
--
Milan Babuskov
http://fbexport.sourceforge.net
> Just a question out of curiosity, why does the classic server stillSome time ago I switched from SS to CS on some of the servers I
> exist?
>
> no one should ever use anything else than superserver,
> threads is just 100 times better,
>
> I just can't understand why they did not make this obsolete as long
> ago as possible.
maintain. When the SS is under big load (monthly reports, etc.) it just
cuts all other users, and to them it seems like it just hangs. CS
balances that load, so if someone runs monthly report, and other users
just want's to do a quick transaction, he doesn't have to wait few hours
to do it.
Look in group archives for a thread named "Time sharing", around 20th
May this year for more info about this.
CS is just great for these kind of sitations.
--
Milan Babuskov
http://fbexport.sourceforge.net