| Subject | Re: Using BLOB hurt performance significantly? | 
|---|---|
| Author | Michael Fung | 
| Post date | 2003-10-03T03:12:08Z | 
Dear Nigel,
What if backup and restore is not of concern? (I know I can just save
the file path, but it means I have to build a client/server program
to transfer the images to a remote user, who is using a client
written with IBObjects)
Rgds,
Michael
--- In firebird-support@yahoogroups.com, "Nigel Weeks" <nigel@e...>
wrote:
            What if backup and restore is not of concern? (I know I can just save
the file path, but it means I have to build a client/server program
to transfer the images to a remote user, who is using a client
written with IBObjects)
Rgds,
Michael
--- In firebird-support@yahoogroups.com, "Nigel Weeks" <nigel@e...>
wrote:
> You can't store a filesystem path instead?will
> Just thinking of your backup/restore times...
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> >
> > Dear all,
> >
> > I need to attach some tiff images to data records. Each record
> > have 2 tiff of around 200KB. If I save the tiff data in a blobfield,
> > it will increase the current database size of 200MB to ~6GB. Willit
> > hurt database performance significantly? Suppose I am usingFB1.5 on
> > RedHat 9.
> >