Subject | Re: [ib-support] Transaktions, summary |
---|---|
Author | Helen Borrie |
Post date | 2003-01-09T11:05:57Z |
At 09:07 AM 9/01/2003 +0000, you wrote:
A gap that grows larger and larger throughout the day is not a problem that
a sweep will fix.
unreasonably large, and repair your software and/or provide some training
for users about abandoning their workstations with unfinished
work..probably both are pertinent to your problem.
resolved. If your software doesn't take care of it then nothing will,
except a server shutdown. Meanwhile, you have an ever-accumulating pile of
old record versions which won't be touched by housekeeping.
heLen
>HiWrong.
>
>I have a customer who complains about the speed dropping during the
>day.
>
>In the morning the transaktions (oldest transaction, oldest active,
>etc) are alike.
>
>But during the day the gab extends.
>The sweep function takes care of this, as far as I know. Correct ?
A gap that grows larger and larger throughout the day is not a problem that
a sweep will fix.
>The default value for sweep is 20.000, correct ?It would not help your problem. You need to find why the gap is getting
>
>Could I change that to i.e. 1.000 ?
>
>Would it affect the system in any way ?
unreasonably large, and repair your software and/or provide some training
for users about abandoning their workstations with unfinished
work..probably both are pertinent to your problem.
>If the sweep function kicks in, and no user is connected, will theNo, the gap won't change until the "interesting" transaction is
>gab then be somewhere between 0 and 1 ?
resolved. If your software doesn't take care of it then nothing will,
except a server shutdown. Meanwhile, you have an ever-accumulating pile of
old record versions which won't be touched by housekeeping.
heLen