Subject | Re: [ib-support] OID: Double or String? |
---|---|
Author | Guillermo Najar-Arreola |
Post date | 2002-08-29T17:24:56Z |
Hi,
I found that GUID is a beautifull candidate for OID; the point is that its a
string. How much I loose in performance if I use a string primary-key
instead of a numeric one ?
Thank you,
Guillermo
""Leyne, Sean"" <sleyne@...> wrote in message
news:66187D861C1747499BE1365B74E0369110ACCC@......
I found that GUID is a beautifull candidate for OID; the point is that its a
string. How much I loose in performance if I use a string primary-key
instead of a numeric one ?
Thank you,
Guillermo
""Leyne, Sean"" <sleyne@...> wrote in message
news:66187D861C1747499BE1365B74E0369110ACCC@......
>
> OIDs???
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Guillermo Najar-Arreola [mailto:gnajar@...]
> > Sent: Wednesday, August 28, 2002 4:22 PM
> > To: ib-support@yahoogroups.com
> > Subject: [ib-support] OID: Double or String?
> >
> >
> > Hi,
> > I'm planning how am I going to implement OIDs for any of my apps using
> > Firebird. I was thinking on strings since I have customers
> > with laptops that
> > download their information to a central server and I want to
> > prefix the OID
> > comming from each computer so I don't have conflicts with
> > OIDs generated in
> > the central server. For Interbase, what data type is more
> > efficient for primary keys ? double or string?
>
>
> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> ib-support-unsubscribe@egroups.com
>
>
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
>
>
>