the changes should be stored
the rollback will have no effect unless an exception stopped the
commitretaining from completing

Alan

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Stevio [mailto:redeagle@...]
> Sent: Wednesday, 21 August 2002 22:34
> To: ib-support@yahoogroups.com
> Subject: Re: [ib-support] CommitRetaining then Rollback - are changes
> stored?
>
>
> The sequence is make changes, call CommitRetaining, call Rollback.
>
> Should the changes be stored?
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Alan McDonald" <alan@...>
> To: <ib-support@yahoogroups.com>
> Sent: Wednesday, August 21, 2002 1:23 PM
> Subject: RE: [ib-support] CommitRetaining then Rollback - are changes
> stored?
>
>
> > If you've just called commitretaining... there's nothing to rollback.
> > Not sure about the exact sequence you're using
> > Alan
> >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Stevio [mailto:redeagle@...]
> > > Sent: Wednesday, 21 August 2002 22:16
> > > To: IB Support
> > > Subject: [ib-support] CommitRetaining then Rollback - are changes
> > > stored?
> > >
> > > I'm starting to get the hang on using transactions, and
> > > understanding them,
> > > but I have the following question.
> > >
> > > If I make changes to a record, then call CommitRetaining, then call
> > > Rollback, should the initial changes be stored?
> > >
> > > I would say Yes, but my application seems to say no!
> > >
> > > The transaction properties are set to Read Committed (with
> read_committed,
> > > rec_version and nowait specified in the settings).
>
>
>
> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> ib-support-unsubscribe@egroups.com
>
>
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
>
>