Subject | Re: error: key size too big for index |
---|---|
Author | vsvadlenka |
Post date | 2002-08-15T07:45:27Z |
--- In ib-support@y..., Aage Johansen <aagjohan@o...> wrote:
exists, for performance reason. Maybe three separate indexes would
do that job?
ODBC driver, and they see and sort tables in MS Access.
> vsvadlenka wrote:benefit might
> ------------------------------------
> I need collation on columns, because I access database through ODBC
> driver and without collating sorting is bad.
> ------------------------------------
>
> Indexes are great for selecting records, but for sorting the
> prove 'negative'. If you want to have an index just for sortingyou may be
> better off without that index.I have compounded idex for quickly finding out, if such record
exists, for performance reason. Maybe three separate indexes would
do that job?
> If the sorting is "bad" you can try to specify the collationdirectly in
> the 'order by' clause.I can when I'm accessing database by sql, but users are connected by
ODBC driver, and they see and sort tables in MS Access.
>bytes per
> There is a limit on key length, and it depends on the (number of
> character in the) character set (I think).
>
>
> Regards,
> Aage J.