Ben,

> The following SQL statment gives an error with UNION key word. If
> I remove union and make
> it to two statment it works! And UNION works without the INSERT
> statment also! Is this an
> expected behaviour of FB ?

I think it is required by the SQL standard, but I stand to be corrected.
FWIW I did notice that behaviour before.
Ciao
--
____
_/\/ando