Subject | Re: [ib-support] Security and ignorance |
---|---|
Author | Paul Schmidt |
Post date | 2002-07-16T15:32:29Z |
On 16 Jul 2002 at 7:27, Ernesto A. Zapata Icart wrote:
good. Most modern operating systems have built in file system security, so you
make sure you use that security. For example in Unix/Linux you create a user for
Interbase, it then owns all of the Interbase files (including the data), and it has
exclusive access to those files. Not sure whether NT/2K/XP can be secured to the
same degree, easily. I know that Win95/Win98/ME can't but those are not read
operating systems anyway.
Paul Schmidt, President
Tricat Technologies
paul@...
www.tricattechnologies.com
> Friends:Theoretically this is true, in practical terms, it isn't if the system administrator is any
> I am a little concerned -surely due to my ignorance -
> regarding
> Interbase and the security. As it is possible that it can substitute
> the file isc4.gdb with one own? As it is possible to copy the file gdb
> in another place -knowing the password of the destination server - and
> to have total access to the data? Does some arrangement exist for this
> problem? Could they illuminate my ignorance helping me a little with
> this topic? Any suggestion will be very seen, since I am very
> according with Interbase, in spite of the mentioned problem.
>
good. Most modern operating systems have built in file system security, so you
make sure you use that security. For example in Unix/Linux you create a user for
Interbase, it then owns all of the Interbase files (including the data), and it has
exclusive access to those files. Not sure whether NT/2K/XP can be secured to the
same degree, easily. I know that Win95/Win98/ME can't but those are not read
operating systems anyway.
Paul Schmidt, President
Tricat Technologies
paul@...
www.tricattechnologies.com