Subject | Re: [ib-support] Security and ignorance |
---|---|
Author | Andreas Pohl |
Post date | 2002-07-16T13:48:59Z |
This is a - maybe helpfull - repost because it isn't available at yah*groups
anymore.
anymore.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Andreas Pohl" <apohl@...>
To: <ib-support@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Saturday, March 31, 2001 3:41 AM
Subject: Re: [ib-support] protecting database
> I would like to inform that solved my own problem how to protect an
> Interbase database for "unwanted" copy (even it is physically accessibly).
[snip]
> My final solution is a software/hardware combination. I'm already using
> hardlock devices (www.hardlock.com, www.alladin.de ). There is a
protection
> system ("Hardlock Bistro") for patching binaries only run if hardlock is
> present. I applied this patch to IBserver without any problems. Second
step
> is to assign file extensions to include with or without encryption. I
> decided that *.gdb files should be readable and *.gds files should be
> encrypted. Last step was to run a backup from an existing gdb file and
> building an gds file via GBAK's restore.
>
> Finally I've got a database running only with patched ibserver version
(that
> is only running with right hardlock device). A copy of this database is
> completely useless on other Interbase systems. But running GBAK will
produce
> a full accessibly database if it restored with gdb extension.
>
> BTW if protected extension is *.* then this patched IBserver version would
> not provide a decrypted database at all!
>
> This a solution what I'm looking for because I've to provide a
> briefcase/replication system offline on clients pc and security of data
was
> "first priority". Maybe these are useful informations to others, for me -
at
> least - it was:)