Subject | Re: [ib-support] GBAK issues |
---|---|
Author | Frank Ingermann |
Post date | 2002-07-03T19:37:07Z |
Hi Sean,
Leyne, Sean wrote:
same dir as the original too, not in system32 ;-)
but seriously, another aspect are read/write permissions. it is clear
that gbak will have rights in the gdb directory, whereas this is not
certain for <wherever else the gks would go>. Any change that avoids
these kind of problems is always welcome!
just my 0.02 eur -
fingerman
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
when parsers parse, and compilers compile, then why don't objects object?
fingerbirdy - fingerman's door to Firebird
http://www.fingerbird.de
Leyne, Sean wrote:
>>They are created - but not where you expect. Do a file search and youdefinetly right - when you edit a text file, the .bak will end up in the
>>will find them. The only way to avoid this is to be a little more
>>specific in your file naming.
>
>
> Worthy of a Feature Request?
>
> It seems natural that the backup/restore path should default to the path
> of the source, thoughts?
same dir as the original too, not in system32 ;-)
but seriously, another aspect are read/write permissions. it is clear
that gbak will have rights in the gdb directory, whereas this is not
certain for <wherever else the gks would go>. Any change that avoids
these kind of problems is always welcome!
just my 0.02 eur -
fingerman
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
when parsers parse, and compilers compile, then why don't objects object?
fingerbirdy - fingerman's door to Firebird
http://www.fingerbird.de