Subject | Re: [ib-support] SELECT Order by DESC |
---|---|
Author | Jason Chapman (JAC2) |
Post date | 2002-05-20T11:41:13Z |
My guess is that indexed values are compressed based on the prior index
value, therefore you have to traverse them in a forward direction, otherwise
they would be inefficient e.g.
Index of
AAAAAA
AAAAAB
AAAAAC
ABDFGH
looks like
AAAAAA
Same 4 + B
Same 4 + C
Same 1 +BDFGH
JAC
"Szak�ly Bal�zs" <szakalyb@...> wrote in message
news:000101c1ffef$e2de4a50$0c00a8c0@SZAKALYB...
value, therefore you have to traverse them in a forward direction, otherwise
they would be inefficient e.g.
Index of
AAAAAA
AAAAAB
AAAAAC
ABDFGH
looks like
AAAAAA
Same 4 + B
Same 4 + C
Same 1 +BDFGH
JAC
"Szak�ly Bal�zs" <szakalyb@...> wrote in message
news:000101c1ffef$e2de4a50$0c00a8c0@SZAKALYB...
> Why cannot use FB any index on select with desc order?http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/=20
>
> Select * from TTT order by FFF desc
>
> There is an index to fff but not desc order. Why cannot use in this
> case?=20
> So, i need to create 2 indexes to all table, where i need desc order
> with high response time.
>
> ---------------------------
> Bal=E1zs Szak=E1ly=20
> MicroRaab Co.
> email szakalyb@...
> ---------------------------
>
>
>
> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> ib-support-unsubscribe@egroups.com
>
> =20
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to
>
>
>