Subject | Re: [ib-support] About relations |
---|---|
Author | Svein Erling Tysvær |
Post date | 2002-03-07T14:56:51Z |
Nando,
I don't think this is Helen's fault. I use the Atkin mirror and it seems as
if Antonio asked this question as a reply to the "[ib-support] Service stop
[INET/inet_error: read errno = 10054]" subject. The main drawback by using
Atkin is actually that people through asking new questions by hitting reply
to a random message and then changing the subject, unintentionally end up
mixing two separate threads that may be difficult to follow. The "Strange
query results, based on where clause" is a good example: First a lot of
"correctly" threaded messages, then a couple of replies to "#CPU_Affinity",
some more strange query results, three messages abount "New User", even
more strange query results and then the question about #CPU_Affinity and
finally some more strange query results. No wonder a structured programmer
gets confused.
So, even though I am no moderator: Please avoid using reply to start a new
subject.
Set
I don't think this is Helen's fault. I use the Atkin mirror and it seems as
if Antonio asked this question as a reply to the "[ib-support] Service stop
[INET/inet_error: read errno = 10054]" subject. The main drawback by using
Atkin is actually that people through asking new questions by hitting reply
to a random message and then changing the subject, unintentionally end up
mixing two separate threads that may be difficult to follow. The "Strange
query results, based on where clause" is a good example: First a lot of
"correctly" threaded messages, then a couple of replies to "#CPU_Affinity",
some more strange query results, three messages abount "New User", even
more strange query results and then the question about #CPU_Affinity and
finally some more strange query results. No wonder a structured programmer
gets confused.
So, even though I am no moderator: Please avoid using reply to start a new
subject.
Set
>Helen,
>funny: your message appears threaded with "[ib-support] Service stop
>[INET/inet_error: read errno = 10054]". Looking at the References, they
>seem correct. Your post references <a65ait+q2cv@...> which is
>the message from enio_bueno.
>
>Either my mailer or yours is fiddling with the references. Can you check
>if you see the same References I see (you may take it off list since no
>one else would be interested)?