> > Sorry, non-ibo-people, this is mostly an IBO issue, I think, but for
> > perhaps one more test I will keep it here, since it seems to have been
> > thrown up by some DSQL change between RC2 and Release 1...
>
> Keep it here, keep it here!
> If the staments work in RC2 and not in 1.0, it's a Firebird issue, and a
> big one.
> Perhaps thousands of (IBO) applications are now unable to work with
> Firebird.
> FWIW, I don't know what the point of qualifying field names in insert is
> in the first place, but a quick look at the SQL specification says it
> should be possible (or, better, I haven'f found where it says it isn't
> allowed).

While I plan to change IBO to be more compatible, and have already done so
for the next sub-release, I would appreciate it if FB1 would be changed so
that it will be backwards compatible. I think that is the right thing to do.
Especially since there is nothing to indicate that IBO is breaking SQL
standards. Not sure why I did it that way. Just life I guess.

Regards,
Jason Wharton
CPS - Mesa AZ
http://www.ibobjects.com