""Artur Anjos"" <arsoft@...> wrote in message
news:001f01c1b70b$903c9fe0$0202a8c0@......

>
> Anyway, I wonder if we must get back to the beggining of tests, or if we

can

> assume that this was a very-localized bug that will not affect any of the
> tests already done.

There's no much to say about a code that added an "else" to deal with
negative numbers, but I prefer that the FB builders (the ones that take the
hard way of testing formally and packaging the release) restart the tests,
just in case.

And it would be fine if people can throw at the engine any crazy example
they can, so we can validate that if a bug is reported, it no longer happens
in the patched product. Specially it's a request for help to people that
love to build the engine from the latest available sources.

The fix was high level. I mean, it's platform independent.

C.
--
Claudio Valderrama C. - http://www.cvalde.com - http://www.firebirdSql.org
Independent developer
Owner of the Interbase® WebRing