Subject | Re: [ib-support] Auditing updates |
---|---|
Author | Jason Chapman (JAC2) |
Post date | 2002-02-13T08:24:37Z |
""David K. Trudgett"" <dkt@...> wrote in message
news:20020212090833.C9371@......
interpreted as false in a conditional.
Your thing about after_update, we always put ours at a set position (1000)
therefore always fire last in our db's.
Cheers,
news:20020212090833.C9371@......
> On Monday 2002-02-11 at 09:13:48 -0000, Jason Chapman (JAC2) wrote:Are you sure, I thought null any_binary_op null => null which is
> > if (old.fld is null and new.fld is not null) or
> > (old.fld is not null and new.fld is null) or
> > (old.fld <> new.fld) then
> > begin
> > EXECUTE PROCEDURE Audit_The_Change(parameters, ...);
> > end
>
> The third condition will be true when OLD and NEW are both NULL, but I
> don't want to log that case.
interpreted as false in a conditional.
Your thing about after_update, we always put ours at a set position (1000)
therefore always fire last in our db's.
Cheers,