Subject | Re: [ib-support] URGENT: API memory leaks! |
---|---|
Author | Lev Assinovsky |
Post date | 2002-02-11T20:53:19Z |
Yes, you are right. Thank you!
If I use DSQL_drop I have to use isq_dsql_allocate_statement then.
Is it expensive?
Is isc_dsql_free_statement(status_vec, stmt, DSQL_drop) expensive?
Sincerely,
"Ann W. Harrison" wrote:
Lev Assinovsky Peterlink Web
Programmer St. Petersburg, Russia
Tel/Fax: +7 812 3275343 197022 ul.Chapigina 7�
E-mail: lev@...
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
If I use DSQL_drop I have to use isq_dsql_allocate_statement then.
Is it expensive?
Is isc_dsql_free_statement(status_vec, stmt, DSQL_drop) expensive?
Sincerely,
"Ann W. Harrison" wrote:
> At 11:00 PM 2/11/2002 +0300, Lev Assinovsky wrote:--
> >Are you sure about isc_dsql_release? I didn't find it in documentation.
> >I use isc_dsql_free_statement(status_vec, stmt, DSQL_close) after last
> >fetch.
>
> Try DSQL_drop. Apparently DSQL_close will close an open record stream
> but does not release the memory.
>
> Regards,
>
> Ann
> www.ibphoenix.com
> We have answers.
>
>
> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> ib-support-unsubscribe@egroups.com
>
>
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
Lev Assinovsky Peterlink Web
Programmer St. Petersburg, Russia
Tel/Fax: +7 812 3275343 197022 ul.Chapigina 7�
E-mail: lev@...
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]