Subject | Re: [ib-support] Relay to another Server |
---|---|
Author | Artur Anjos |
Post date | 2002-10-18T07:44:47Z |
Diedrick
I'm still quite confuse about your question. You don't need to 'login' on a
FB Server to connect to it. Just connect. For example, you can login to a
Win NT Server and at the same time be connected to various Firebird servers.
change it to accept anything. I use to have a .ini file to keep the server
connection strings. You can use the registy also.
Artur
I'm still quite confuse about your question. You don't need to 'login' on a
FB Server to connect to it. Just connect. For example, you can login to a
Win NT Server and at the same time be connected to various Firebird servers.
> (the application thinks thatIf you can change the application to change the connect string, you can
> the machine to login into and the db server are always the same).
change it to accept anything. I use to have a .ini file to keep the server
connection strings. You can use the registy also.
Artur
----- Original Message -----
From: "Diederik Wierenga" <diederik.wierenga@...>
To: <ib-support@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Friday, October 18, 2002 8:35 AM
Subject: Re: [ib-support] Relay to another Server
> Thomas,
> [...]
> > > find that article again...)that a connection string of
> > > "192.168.1.1:192.168.1.2:c:\data\mydatabase.gdb" should be able to do
> so. We
> [...]
> > Have you tried the following connection string?
> >
> > 192.168.1.2:c:\data\mydatabase.gdb
>
> We have tried this (and it worked of course), but the whole idea behind
this
> connection string is to have 1 host IP to which we can login and issues
> commands(other than Firebird access) and to which we can set up db access.
> The actual location and server for the database should be fairly
transparent
> to the user. However we need to be able to login to different machines
while
> fetching data from the same database.
>
> At the moment this setup is particular to one customer so it would be nice
> if we could solve this by doing it via the connection string and thus
> leaving the rest of the application untouched (the application thinks that
> the machine to login into and the db server are always the same).
>
> I am 99% sure that I have seen a connection string of this type in a
> newsarticle. To my very sincere regrets I did not archive this article and
I
> cannot remember which newsgroup featured this article... ;-(((
>
> I hope this clarifies things a bit.
>
> Thanks for your answer.
>
> Diederik