Subject Re: [ib-support] Relay to another Server
Author Artur Anjos
Diedrick

I'm still quite confuse about your question. You don't need to 'login' on a
FB Server to connect to it. Just connect. For example, you can login to a
Win NT Server and at the same time be connected to various Firebird servers.

> (the application thinks that
> the machine to login into and the db server are always the same).
If you can change the application to change the connect string, you can
change it to accept anything. I use to have a .ini file to keep the server
connection strings. You can use the registy also.

Artur



----- Original Message -----
From: "Diederik Wierenga" <diederik.wierenga@...>
To: <ib-support@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Friday, October 18, 2002 8:35 AM
Subject: Re: [ib-support] Relay to another Server


> Thomas,
> [...]
> > > find that article again...)that a connection string of
> > > "192.168.1.1:192.168.1.2:c:\data\mydatabase.gdb" should be able to do
> so. We
> [...]
> > Have you tried the following connection string?
> >
> > 192.168.1.2:c:\data\mydatabase.gdb
>
> We have tried this (and it worked of course), but the whole idea behind
this
> connection string is to have 1 host IP to which we can login and issues
> commands(other than Firebird access) and to which we can set up db access.
> The actual location and server for the database should be fairly
transparent
> to the user. However we need to be able to login to different machines
while
> fetching data from the same database.
>
> At the moment this setup is particular to one customer so it would be nice
> if we could solve this by doing it via the connection string and thus
> leaving the rest of the application untouched (the application thinks that
> the machine to login into and the db server are always the same).
>
> I am 99% sure that I have seen a connection string of this type in a
> newsarticle. To my very sincere regrets I did not archive this article and
I
> cannot remember which newsgroup featured this article... ;-(((
>
> I hope this clarifies things a bit.
>
> Thanks for your answer.
>
> Diederik