Subject | Re[2]: [ib-support] Pump and performance question... |
---|---|
Author | Carlos H. Cantu |
Post date | 2002-10-14T18:53:14Z |
Thanks Ann !
[]s
Carlos
WarmBoot Informatica - http://www.warmboot.com.br
Interbase-BR - http://www.interbase-br.com
AWH> At 03:33 PM 10/14/2002 -0300, Carlos H. Cantu wrote:
AWH> transaction, all it does is coordinate operations between child
AWH> transactions, one in each participating database. So there's
AWH> slightly less overhead if you open a transaction in each database.
AWH> Regards,
AWH> Ann
AWH> www.ibphoenix.com
AWH> We have answers.
AWH> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
AWH> ib-support-unsubscribe@egroups.com
AWH> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
[]s
Carlos
WarmBoot Informatica - http://www.warmboot.com.br
Interbase-BR - http://www.interbase-br.com
AWH> At 03:33 PM 10/14/2002 -0300, Carlos H. Cantu wrote:
>>Hello !AWH> In theory, it should make no difference. If you have a common
>>
>>Does anybody had played with this :
>>
>>When doing a Pump between 2 databases, what is the best option
>>regarding performance : Keep both of them sharing the same transaction
>>or keep separated transactions for each one ?
AWH> transaction, all it does is coordinate operations between child
AWH> transactions, one in each participating database. So there's
AWH> slightly less overhead if you open a transaction in each database.
AWH> Regards,
AWH> Ann
AWH> www.ibphoenix.com
AWH> We have answers.
AWH> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
AWH> ib-support-unsubscribe@egroups.com
AWH> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/