"Nando Dessena" <nandod@...> wrote in message
news:3C4459E8.390214F4@......

> Helen et al,
>
> > 'yyyymmdd' (yy not valid)
>
> can anyone confirm this last one? I ain't been able to make it work.

That format doesn't work, but I use
'yyyy.mm.dd'
and it works.

BTW, it would be fine to support yyyymmdd as I know other engines that do.

C.
--
Claudio Valderrama C. - http://www.cvalde.com - http://www.firebirdSql.org
Independent developer
Owner of the Interbase® WebRing