Subject | RE: [ib-support] Why Red Hat didnt got IB instead of PostGreSQL ? |
---|---|
Author | Gerhardus Geldenhuis |
Post date | 2001-06-29T06:45:12Z |
Is that not a bit of a short term vision. I think Firebird is a
better database and the fact that firebird is on sourceforge should
saveguard against any problems consering these battles. Should a
company not choose on the basis of performance/specs rather than
on ownership/lackof ?
Btw Name recognition would come much slower without such decisions
in our favor.
Groete
Gerhardus
better database and the fact that firebird is on sourceforge should
saveguard against any problems consering these battles. Should a
company not choose on the basis of performance/specs rather than
on ownership/lackof ?
Btw Name recognition would come much slower without such decisions
in our favor.
Groete
Gerhardus
>
> PostgreSQL has wider name recognition and doesn't come with a
> huge battle around it. Everybody agrees that nobody really owns
> PostgreSQL, which is better (from Red Hat's perspective) than
> trying to deal with something that two groups claim to own.
>
>
> Regards,
>
> Ann