Subject | RE: [ib-support] Re: Non-indexed reads on system tables |
---|---|
Author | Thomas Steinmaurer |
Post date | 2001-06-22T18:05:56Z |
Hi Ann,
Easy to fix? Sounds interesting :-).
I had some situations where it would be useful to define user-defined system
tables. Tables which "survives" an metadata backup/restore like system
tables.
Thomas
Easy to fix? Sounds interesting :-).
I had some situations where it would be useful to define user-defined system
tables. Tables which "survives" an metadata backup/restore like system
tables.
Thomas
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Ann W. Harrison [mailto:aharrison@...]
> Sent: Friday, June 22, 2001 7:32 PM
> To: ib-support@yahoogroups.com; ib-support@yahoogroups.com
> Subject: RE: [ib-support] Re: Non-indexed reads on system tables
>
>
> At 11:37 AM 6/22/2001 +0200, Thomas Steinmaurer wrote:
> >Are indices on system tables after a metadata backup lost or is this only
> >for user-defined triggers on system tables?
>
> Yes, user defined indexes, columns, and triggers are all lost
> on backup/restore. It would be easy to fix, but it hasn't happened
> yet (in 14 years!)
>
>
> Regards,
>
> Ann
> www.ibphoenix.com
> We have answers.
>
>
> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> ib-support-unsubscribe@egroups.com
>
>
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
>
>
>