Subject | Re: [ib-support] limitations/maximum specs |
---|---|
Author | Ivan Prenosil |
Post date | 2001-06-14T16:01:04Z |
Ann,
thanks for explanation.
(e.g. shortest record_header+record+padding on win32 is 24 bytes,
i.e. 5 unused bytes assuming minimal length record)
so enhancing the algorithm probaly does not have high priority
(especially considering it would require changing ODS);
OTOH, now if FB supports 64-bit I/O, more people will use it for large databases ...
Ivan
prenosil@...
http://www.volny.cz/iprenosil/interbase
thanks for explanation.
> (BITS_PER_LONG + 2);....
> The extra two bits are free space indicators which are stored atI assume it distinguishes [empty / full / half-empty] page.
> the bottom of the pointer page - two bits per data page.
> ... Firebird is assuming a zero length record.....
> The actual minimum length record is two bytes - oneAnd there can also be several padding bytes to ensure proper alignment
> byte for a single char field and one byte to hold the null flag,
(e.g. shortest record_header+record+padding on win32 is 24 bytes,
i.e. 5 unused bytes assuming minimal length record)
> A more reasonable algorithm would use different values max_recordOnly very few people complained about too limited number of rows so far,
> values for different tables, taking a plausible compression ratio.
> Personally, I'd rather steal a couple bytes from the table portion
> of the db_key, though that's going to have repercussions everywhere.
so enhancing the algorithm probaly does not have high priority
(especially considering it would require changing ODS);
OTOH, now if FB supports 64-bit I/O, more people will use it for large databases ...
Ivan
prenosil@...
http://www.volny.cz/iprenosil/interbase