Subject RE: [ib-support] UDFs don't work as they used to V6.01 vs V5.6
Author Kevin Stanton
Thanks for the info Helen - much appreciated.

The money domain is double due to dialect 1. I have yet to try dialect 3.
I have spent the hour(s) converting to d3, but haven't put it in the field
yet. Would love to get there someday.
-----Original Message-----
From: Helen Borrie [mailto:helebor@...]
Sent: Wednesday, May 02, 2001 9:21 PM
Subject: Re: [ib-support] UDFs don't work as they used to V6.01 vs V5.6

At 04:33 PM 02-05-01 -0700, you wrote:
>MAJOR Problem! (I think)

Yup. The Migration Guide discusses some of the issues of the shift from
32-bit to 64-bit integers as the underlying storage format for numbers.
These are clearly going to affect UDFs that fool around with precision.

>Is this a bug in V6.01 or

Not a bug - a migration pitfall :)

>should UDFs not be used in a Where clause?????

Not a problem as you have used it. Not a problem if the UDF works as

Is there any special reason why your MONEY domain is defined as a double?


All for Open and Open for All
InterBase Developer Initiative ยท

Yahoo! Groups Sponsor
EstateTelecommunicationsTransportationOt her...

Find Business Information

To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]