Subject | RE: [ib-support] Performance on a XEON processor |
---|---|
Author | Leyne, Sean |
Post date | 2001-04-19T13:31:34Z |
Hugo,
Given the additional cost, I'd suggest you stick with a standard
processor, and spend the money in the best cache disk controller you can
find.
For most databases, the most 'expensive' and common operation is disk
I/O.
Sean
-----Original Message-----
From: Hug [mailto:hugosan@...]
Sent: Thursday, April 19, 2001 8:52 AM
To: Interbase Support
Subject: [ib-support] Performance on a XEON processor
I hear about the Intel Pentium III XEON processor, which is specially
conceived (builded) for DataBase tasks.
But, it costs five times more money than their Non-Xeon equivalent (same
CPU-speed).
It is worthwhile the expense?
Anyone has experience on this?
TIA
Hugo.
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
ib-support-unsubscribe@egroups.com
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
Given the additional cost, I'd suggest you stick with a standard
processor, and spend the money in the best cache disk controller you can
find.
For most databases, the most 'expensive' and common operation is disk
I/O.
Sean
-----Original Message-----
From: Hug [mailto:hugosan@...]
Sent: Thursday, April 19, 2001 8:52 AM
To: Interbase Support
Subject: [ib-support] Performance on a XEON processor
I hear about the Intel Pentium III XEON processor, which is specially
conceived (builded) for DataBase tasks.
But, it costs five times more money than their Non-Xeon equivalent (same
CPU-speed).
It is worthwhile the expense?
Anyone has experience on this?
TIA
Hugo.
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
ib-support-unsubscribe@egroups.com
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/