Subject | Re: [ib-support] Machines with mult-processors |
---|---|
Author | Frank Ingermann |
Post date | 2001-04-18T17:02:53Z |
Hello Luiz,
Luiz wrote:
Win2000 with dual processors in the german IB ng, the result seems there is
currently *no* soultion to the problem. (Please anybody correct me if i'm
wrong!)
To quote Christain's quote of my own msg :-)
no effect, and thus does *not* stop the juggling. (to be more precise: win2k
does not allow one process to modify the affinity mask of another, which is
exactly what IBAffinity does with IBServer.)
If anyone has a solution to this (ore more insight to the topic of affinity
masks and maybe a workaround), i'd be very interested myself as i also have
to set up a dual-proc Win2k for IB shortly... and i'd really like a better
solution than to rip out the 2nd CPU ;-)
regards,
fingerman
Luiz wrote:
>I'm stuck with that problem at the moment: there was a short thread about
> Using win 2000 server, does the problem still exists or this happend only in
> NT server?
Win2000 with dual processors in the german IB ng, the result seems there is
currently *no* soultion to the problem. (Please anybody correct me if i'm
wrong!)
To quote Christain's quote of my own msg :-)
>This little tool [IBAffinity] modifies the "affinity mask" of the IBServerThe problem seems that under Win2k, setting the affinity mask appears to have
>process in such a way that IB will be *bound* to one cpu, preventing NT from
>doing it's "cpu juggling".
no effect, and thus does *not* stop the juggling. (to be more precise: win2k
does not allow one process to modify the affinity mask of another, which is
exactly what IBAffinity does with IBServer.)
If anyone has a solution to this (ore more insight to the topic of affinity
masks and maybe a workaround), i'd be very interested myself as i also have
to set up a dual-proc Win2k for IB shortly... and i'd really like a better
solution than to rip out the 2nd CPU ;-)
regards,
fingerman