Subject | Re: [ib-support] Is a joined query faster than a subquery, or doesn't it matter? |
---|---|
Author | Ann W. Harrison |
Post date | 2001-02-15T19:31:46Z |
At 09:03 AM 2/15/2001 +0100, Jörg Schiemann wrote:
the nominative plural would be indice (without the s, I think. It's been a
LONG time.) When we were setting out the system tables, I thought indices
sounded more educated. In fact, it sounds pedantic and also incorrect.
Careful English usage separates two senses of the word index. One is a
measure of something - the Consumer Price Index for example. When plural,
those are correctly called indices. The other is a table of keys into
a lump of data (book index, database index) and its plural is indexes.
Regards,
Ann
www.ibphoenix.com
We have answers.
>There is only one thing which is confusing me, maybe because of my lack inThe word "index" comes from Latin (4th? 5th? declension neuter.) In Latin
>the english language. Indexes and indices, is it the same or is there a
>difference?
the nominative plural would be indice (without the s, I think. It's been a
LONG time.) When we were setting out the system tables, I thought indices
sounded more educated. In fact, it sounds pedantic and also incorrect.
Careful English usage separates two senses of the word index. One is a
measure of something - the Consumer Price Index for example. When plural,
those are correctly called indices. The other is a table of keys into
a lump of data (book index, database index) and its plural is indexes.
Regards,
Ann
www.ibphoenix.com
We have answers.