Subject | Re: [ib-support] When do FB/IB 'flush' to disk? |
---|---|
Author | Claudio Valderrama C. |
Post date | 2001-11-29T02:14:48Z |
"Phil Shrimpton" <phil@...> wrote in message
news:0111281157550A.30819@fred...
not been closed and for some reason the current changes aren't marked as
permanent. Maybe if I spy on MsSql I can tell you what MS does, regarding
the API. There are NT kernel calls that aren't available to Win32. This is
the reason for the black legend about MS reserving some obscure calls for
themselves to beat the competition.
C.
--
Claudio Valderrama C. - http://www.cvalde.com - http://www.firebirdSql.org
Independent developer
Owner of the Interbase® WebRing
news:0111281157550A.30819@fred...
> On Wednesday 28 November 2001 11:11, you wrote:NTFS is "helping" you, probably. The "transaction" in the file system has
>
> NTFS
not been closed and for some reason the current changes aren't marked as
permanent. Maybe if I spy on MsSql I can tell you what MS does, regarding
the API. There are NT kernel calls that aren't available to Win32. This is
the reason for the black legend about MS reserving some obscure calls for
themselves to beat the competition.
> I need 'forced writes = ON' without the performance penaty <g>, or failingHow would flushing differ from forced writes? I'm not sure I get the idea.
> that, so way of signaling FB to flush its file(s) either manually, or
> automatically (like the sweep thread)
C.
--
Claudio Valderrama C. - http://www.cvalde.com - http://www.firebirdSql.org
Independent developer
Owner of the Interbase® WebRing