Subject | Re: [ib-support] Idea for a new field type for FB 2,0 or IB 7? |
---|---|
Author | Claudio Valderrama C. |
Post date | 2001-11-23T01:22:58Z |
<lester@...> wrote in message news:3BFCB1FC.838EC43C@......
There're enough well-known, documented, random, not categorized and not
officially acknowledged bugs that affect stored procedures and views as to
extend what we have, so extensions that rely on or use views and procedures
should be minor until we can tame some bugs at least.
C.
--
Claudio Valderrama C. - http://www.cvalde.com - http://www.firebirdSql.org
Independent developer
Owner of the Interbase® WebRing
> > And, while people are at it, I want the ability to:From a practical standpoint, allow me to spoil the party:
> >
> > EXECUTE PROCEDURE some_proc ( acol, acol, acol, ... )
> > SELECT ( acol, acol, acol, ... )
> >
> > <Snip>
> >
> > Thus, it would take all records from the select and pump them into the
> > stored procedure.
>
> 'Datapump' in the engine - that would be nice!
There're enough well-known, documented, random, not categorized and not
officially acknowledged bugs that affect stored procedures and views as to
extend what we have, so extensions that rely on or use views and procedures
should be minor until we can tame some bugs at least.
C.
--
Claudio Valderrama C. - http://www.cvalde.com - http://www.firebirdSql.org
Independent developer
Owner of the Interbase® WebRing