| Subject | RE: [ib-support] Idea for a new field type for FB 2,0 or IB 7? |
|---|---|
| Author | Doug Chamberlin |
| Post date | 2001-11-21T16:20:43Z |
I would prefer to see the syntax setup as an alternative DOMAIN definition
rather than a direct field type. Also, the syntax should allow for
specifying the trigger priority number to be used as well as the generator
name to be used.
rather than a direct field type. Also, the syntax should allow for
specifying the trigger priority number to be used as well as the generator
name to be used.