Subject | Re: [ib-support] NOT NULL constraints and the System Tables |
---|---|
Author | Claudio Valderrama C. |
Post date | 2001-11-16T05:29:44Z |
""Martijn Tonies"" <m.tonies@...> wrote in message
news:004101c16dcd$04274410$0201a8c0@seal...
constraint in rdb$relation_constraints and rdb$check_constraints doesn't get
dropped automagically... Is this as expected or not?
Those inconsistencies are expected as you are observing a constraints system
mounted over an older constraints system, same as the SQL security model was
mounted over the GDML, ACL-based security model. It would be nice to clean
the house a bit. Maybe you coud fill a request for enhancent at SF.
C.
--
Claudio Valderrama C. - http://www.cvalde.com - http://www.firebirdSql.org
Independent developer
Owner of the Interbase® WebRing
news:004101c16dcd$04274410$0201a8c0@seal...
> Hi,RDB$NULL_FLAG does the trick. But, when setting it to 0 or NULL, the
>
> I've just tested with the latest FB release and IB too, just modifying the
constraint in rdb$relation_constraints and rdb$check_constraints doesn't get
dropped automagically... Is this as expected or not?
Those inconsistencies are expected as you are observing a constraints system
mounted over an older constraints system, same as the SQL security model was
mounted over the GDML, ACL-based security model. It would be nice to clean
the house a bit. Maybe you coud fill a request for enhancent at SF.
C.
--
Claudio Valderrama C. - http://www.cvalde.com - http://www.firebirdSql.org
Independent developer
Owner of the Interbase® WebRing