Subject | Re: [ib-support] RE: CORRECTION "Name of Referential Constraint not defined in constraints table" ;=( |
---|---|
Author | Ann W. Harrison |
Post date | 2001-11-13T20:19:37Z |
At 09:12 PM 11/13/2001 +0100, Tobias Giesen wrote:
make a policy of naming your unique indexes U_<whatever>, you won't
have this problem. Nor will you have it in Firebird 1. The name
doesn't have to start with U - anything that sorts after RDB$PRIMARY9<x>
will do.
Regards,
Ann
www.ibphoenix.com
We have answers.
>I lied - yes there was an index. I removed it, and now it works!This is going to sound unbelievably hokey, but here goes. If you
>
>So ... I guess I can add the index as the last thing in the script, let's
>see ...
make a policy of naming your unique indexes U_<whatever>, you won't
have this problem. Nor will you have it in Firebird 1. The name
doesn't have to start with U - anything that sorts after RDB$PRIMARY9<x>
will do.
Regards,
Ann
www.ibphoenix.com
We have answers.