Subject Re: [ib-support] RE: CORRECTION "Name of Referential Constraint not defined in constraints table" ;=(
Author Ann W. Harrison
At 09:12 PM 11/13/2001 +0100, Tobias Giesen wrote:

>I lied - yes there was an index. I removed it, and now it works!
>So ... I guess I can add the index as the last thing in the script, let's
>see ...

This is going to sound unbelievably hokey, but here goes. If you
make a policy of naming your unique indexes U_<whatever>, you won't
have this problem. Nor will you have it in Firebird 1. The name
doesn't have to start with U - anything that sorts after RDB$PRIMARY9<x>
will do.


We have answers.