Subject | RE: [ib-support] Firebird and wildcard events |
---|---|
Author | Martijn Tonies |
Post date | 2001-11-08T07:50:57Z |
Hi,
developer point of view.
IBX into FBX? (sorry, I don't)
I'll be monitoring firebird-devel for any threads about the issue...
Martijn Tonies
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>? Will there be a 1.5 version ? That's kinda new to me :)
> > If I recall correctly, there was a change in Firebird
> supporting wild-
> > card events, is that right?
>
> Partially. I'm the one who's responsible for this piece of
> code. The work is
> 95% done, but there is still a couple of pending issues to be
> solved, so the
> code hasn't been commited to the CVS tree yet. I'm going to
> complete it for
> v1.5.
> > If so, how does one register for such events? Just like the old wayJust what I expected :)
> > and the engine will handle the actual posting?
> >
> > eg:
> >
> > register: uren.update.*
> >
> > post-event:
> > uren.update.10
> > uren.update.test
> > uren.update.xx
>
> Yes, the registration is fully compatible with the current design. The
> engine compares the actually posted events with the
> registered masks and
> delivers the actual events to all requesters.
> With wildcarded events isc_event_counts() will return the summarizedAh, ok - that makes sense.
> information:
>
> uren.update.* = 7
>
> and new API call (let's name it isc_event_details) will
> return something
> like this:
>
> uren.update.10 = 2
> uren.update.test = 1
> uren.update.xx = 4
> Since I haven't implemented this API routine yet, you'reI'm not very much into the API and all. But I can discuss from a technical
> welcome to discuss
> it in the firebird-devel mailing list to find the most
> appropriate solution
> together.
developer point of view.
> Please also note that this feature will be immediatelyVery good - I'm using IBO most of the time :)
> available only with
> API level programming. AFAIR, Jason has shown an interest in
> supporting this
> in IBO, but I'm afraid IBX users will never be able to use such anIBX will be a problem indeed. Perhaps someone can take the time to transform
> improvement until we decide to provide a patch for every IBX
> update released
> by Jeff.
IBX into FBX? (sorry, I don't)
I'll be monitoring firebird-devel for any threads about the issue...
Martijn Tonies
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]