Subject | RE: [ib-support] FIRST X SKIP 0/1 |
---|---|
Author | Ann W. Harrison |
Post date | 2001-10-18T17:35:51Z |
At 01:22 PM 10/18/2001 -0400, Leyne, Sean wrote:
that, and, not all being C programmers, we decided that the first
record was record 1. During the scramble over keywords (always
the hardest part of any project), the syntax was changed but not
the record numbering.
Regards,
Ann
www.ibphoenix.com
We have answers.
> >To be fair, the original keyword was "START AT" or something like
> > At the moment FB1.0 :
> > SKIP 0 is error..
> > SKIP 1 really mean SKIP 0
>
>Yes, the programmer had a 'unique' perspective on the way that the
>offset (SKIP) would be specified -- we were able to correct this
>impression
that, and, not all being C programmers, we decided that the first
record was record 1. During the scramble over keywords (always
the hardest part of any project), the syntax was changed but not
the record numbering.
Regards,
Ann
www.ibphoenix.com
We have answers.