Subject RE: [ib-support] FIRST X SKIP 0/1
Author Ann W. Harrison
At 01:22 PM 10/18/2001 -0400, Leyne, Sean wrote:

> >
> > At the moment FB1.0 :
> > SKIP 0 is error..
> > SKIP 1 really mean SKIP 0
>Yes, the programmer had a 'unique' perspective on the way that the
>offset (SKIP) would be specified -- we were able to correct this

To be fair, the original keyword was "START AT" or something like
that, and, not all being C programmers, we decided that the first
record was record 1. During the scramble over keywords (always
the hardest part of any project), the syntax was changed but not
the record numbering.


We have answers.