Yep :") I'm doing it that way.... but I was wondering, i see now many
programs comes binded to libwrap (rsync, sendmail to name a few), so that
they can use the rules in hosts.allow/deny ...(of course if compiled with
this support).
Is it easy this to be done for FB too and does it worth it... !! I mean
adding the SS under libwrap control not under inetd/xinetd control ...if u
understand me right...
=====
iVAN
raptor@...
=====


| raptor wrote:
|
| > Sorry I ddin't specified fully... I mean listening on say interface
| > eth0(f.e. 192.168.0.1 and 127.0.0.1), but not listening on
| > ppp0-interface(f.e. 217.34.X.Y) .. gotcha
|
| You will need to use ipchains or sth. the like to do this,
| FB doesn't know anything about interfaces.
|
| Frank