Subject | Re: kinterbasdb build failed with gcc-4.7 |
---|---|
Author | Philippe Makowski |
Post date | 2012-01-18T08:37:16Z |
Alex Peshkoff [2012-01-18 09:24] :
For the fedora package, I will just add a patch
about releasing kinterbasdb-3.3.1 , I let Pavel decide, but with the
new Python driver coming, I'm not sure it is a good idea
> On 01/18/12 12:07, Philippe Makowski wrote:thanks
>> Alex Peshkoff [2012-01-18 09:01] :
>>> What branch are you compiling? In trunk I see lines with errors
>>> commented. Do not think that gcc 4.7 stopped to understand comments :)
>>> BTW, it's time to remove that lines at all.
>>>
>> the official tar.bz2 kinterbasdb-3.3.0.tar.bz2
>>
>> http://sourceforge.net/projects/firebird/files/firebird-python/kinterbasdb%203.3/kinterbasdb-3.3.0.tar.bz2/download
>>
>
> Yes - in this file error lines are not commented.
>
> In fb 2.1 and previous we had following lines in ibase.h:
>
> #define isc_info_db_impl_isc_a
> isc_info_db_impl_isc_apl_68K
>
> #define isc_info_db_impl_isc_u
> isc_info_db_impl_isc_vax_ultr
>
> #define isc_info_db_impl_isc_v
> isc_info_db_impl_isc_vms
>
> #define isc_info_db_impl_isc_s isc_info_db_impl_isc_sun_68k
>
> They were cleaned away by Marius
> http://firebird.svn.sourceforge.net/viewvc/firebird/firebird/trunk/src/jrd/inf_pub.h?r1=52265&r2=52964
>
> In SVN repository lines with this constants are commented, in tarball -
> not. Certainly we can restore this lines in next (2.5.2) release, but I
> have no idea what to do now. May be release kinterbasdb-3.3.1 with this
> single change?
>
For the fedora package, I will just add a patch
about releasing kinterbasdb-3.3.1 , I let Pavel decide, but with the
new Python driver coming, I'm not sure it is a good idea