fred.vlietstra wrote:

> Mark,
>
> this is the most likely cause. But if have tested the code using an
> existing "lidnr". It must be something stupid.
>
> Do you know a trick to get the contains of the SQL statement after
> filling the statement.

I don't think that is possible, but maybe someone else knows a trick.
--
Mark Rotteveel <Avalanche1979@...>