> but on the other hand, it might be quite logical to get notified about

the deadlock right away.
It's the fact that the table reservation doesn't occur that I'm most
concerned about...

Please keep me posted if you wouldn't mind - I signed up for the dev list
so I'll watch progress on there too...

cheers,

David



|---------+----------------------------->
| | "Roman Rokytskyy" |
| | <rrokytskyy@...|
| | g> |
| | Sent by: |
| | Firebird-Java@yaho|
| | ogroups.com |
| | |
| | |
| | 02/08/2006 02:04 |
| | AM |
| | Please respond to |
| | Firebird-Java |
| | |
|---------+----------------------------->

>--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| |
| To: <Firebird-Java@yahoogroups.com> |
| cc: |
| Subject: Re: [Firebird-Java] Pool bug? |

>--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|




> BTW, is there any update on the status of the table reservation issue,
> Roman? Did you manage to find time to submit to dev?

I have created C++ test framework and tested different TPBs (consistency
and
concurrency), but did not submit it yet. I only can confirm that it behaves
not like I would expect it to behave, but on the other hand, it might be
quite logical to get notified about the deadlock right away.

Roman




Yahoo! Groups Links