Subject | Re: Possible bug inFirebird1.5.2Classic(cross-post) |
---|---|
Author | johnson_dave2003 |
Post date | 2005-08-08T13:35:04Z |
--- In Firebird-Java@yahoogroups.com, "Roman Rokytskyy"
<rrokytskyy@a...> wrote:
even in my world. I would never have figured it out had I discovered
it in a running app instead of the first testcase for the class
factory. It would have appeared as a random "glitch" that I could
not reliably reproduce.
jUnit is your friend! :o)
I will keep tabs on the FB2 builds and watch for this fix.
Thanks again for your help. Did I say yet that jaybird is awesome?
<rrokytskyy@a...> wrote:
> I do not say that it is wrong - Firebird should handle thiscorrectly (and
> it does in SS version), but I suspect that something goes wrongwith table
> reference bookkeeping. Since that was not discovered till now, thisis
> somewhat unusual for me :)I have to agree that this represents a less than 1% usage scenario,
>
> Roman
even in my world. I would never have figured it out had I discovered
it in a running app instead of the first testcase for the class
factory. It would have appeared as a random "glitch" that I could
not reliably reproduce.
jUnit is your friend! :o)
I will keep tabs on the FB2 builds and watch for this fix.
Thanks again for your help. Did I say yet that jaybird is awesome?