Hi,

> As you can see, this message is much more descriptive. Couldnt the
> executeBatch() exception bring a descriptive message as well? Is all
> that right or there is something I am missing?

In general this is not possible. JDBC specs allow driver to continue
executing a batch even if error happens. If more than one statement
fails with different messages, which one should we pick up?

But in case of JayBird you're right. We do not continue executing
batch (this is also allowed by specs). I have fixed this, will be
available from the CVS today.

Roman