Subject | Re: [Firebird-Java] Problems using FirebirdSQL-1.5.0BetaJDK_1.4 driver with JBoss 3.0.x |
---|---|
Author | Martijn Tonies |
Post date | 2004-01-26T12:17:51Z |
Problems using FirebirdSQL-1.5.0BetaJDK_1.4 driver with JBoss 3.0.xHi Kris,
right away. People _might_ be busy or are currently looking into it.
On the other hand, invest some time yourself and try to get some
exact steps reproducing the error - or try finding a cause. This is open
source software, after all.
This is a support list - the Java driver guys do hangout here, but they
have their day-time jobs as well.
The reason I wrote this is that I sometimes get a bit tired of
people saying things like:
- hey, this and that database engine returns better error
messages, should I just continue using that?
- hey, in MySQL this works like so and so - I'd better stick
with MySQL then.
- I don't understand feature X, so I'd better use PGSQL,
cause then I know what I'm doing...
etc...
--
Martijn
>><The point is that this is not an overly busy list. Don't expect an answer
>>How many posts have you seen to this list since the 22nd (when
>>your first posted your question?)>
>
>Not many. What is your point?. Is this list going to be closed? Have
>I posted my question to the wrong list?
right away. People _might_ be busy or are currently looking into it.
On the other hand, invest some time yourself and try to get some
exact steps reproducing the error - or try finding a cause. This is open
source software, after all.
>Don't get me wrong. I don't expect you (firebird-team) to just let anythingsilence.
>else go and jump into this issue right away. I know how these things works.
>But I would have at least preferred some kind of reponse instead of just
This is a support list - the Java driver guys do hangout here, but they
have their day-time jobs as well.
>As it often is in cases like this I have customers at my end pulling forsome
>answers. I don't post questions like this just to annoy you guys.Sure hope not ;-)
>I do it becauseIsn't that what you were doing? If not, then I apologize.
>of business.
>><If MySQL suits your needs, stick with it :-)>
>What do you think? No need to get sarcastic right..
The reason I wrote this is that I sometimes get a bit tired of
people saying things like:
- hey, this and that database engine returns better error
messages, should I just continue using that?
- hey, in MySQL this works like so and so - I'd better stick
with MySQL then.
- I don't understand feature X, so I'd better use PGSQL,
cause then I know what I'm doing...
etc...
--
Martijn